home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
kermit.columbia.edu
/
kermit.columbia.edu.tar
/
kermit.columbia.edu
/
newsgroups
/
misc.19950929-19951130
/
000368_news@columbia.edu_Mon Nov 13 19:29:32 1995.msg
< prev
next >
Wrap
Internet Message Format
|
1995-12-25
|
2KB
Received: from apakabar.cc.columbia.edu by watsun.cc.columbia.edu with SMTP id AA08684
(5.65c+CU/IDA-1.4.4/HLK for <kermit.misc@watsun>); Mon, 13 Nov 1995 14:29:36 -0500
Received: (from news@localhost) by apakabar.cc.columbia.edu (8.6.12/8.6.12) id OAA18787 for kermit.misc@watsun; Mon, 13 Nov 1995 14:29:34 -0500
Path: news.columbia.edu!watsun.cc.columbia.edu!fdc
From: fdc@watsun.cc.columbia.edu (Frank da Cruz)
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.kermit.misc
Subject: Re: Kermit slow on fast modem ?
Date: 13 Nov 1995 19:29:32 GMT
Organization: Columbia University
Lines: 20
Message-Id: <4886as$ib0@apakabar.cc.columbia.edu>
References: <DHq72F.K2A@inter.NL.net>
Nntp-Posting-Host: watsun.cc.columbia.edu
Apparently-To: kermit.misc@watsun.cc.columbia.edu
In article <DHq72F.K2A@inter.NL.net>, Wim Glas <wglas@inter.NL.net> wrote:
>I am using kermit on our HP-UX system to transfer files on a PC with a
>28k8 modem. The filetransfer still stays at ca. 230 chars/second which is
>the same as with a 2400 baud modem. The modem connects at 28k8 with
>compression, so this is not the problem.
>What could be the problem ? On the PC I use TELIX .
>
HP-UX versions prior to 10.00 generally have a very old version of Kermit
that lacks most of the modern performance improvements. Telix has a very
poor implementation of Kermit. If you use C-Kermit 5A(190) on HP-UX and
MS-DOS Kermit instead of Telix on the PC, you achieve the high transfer
rates you expect. More information at:
http://www.columbia.edu/kermit/
and, in particular (about Telix):
http://www.columbia.edu/kermit/newsn5.html#perf
- Frank